- Method
- Full removal
- Potential fit
- Accessible tank, planned construction, contamination concern, or authority preference
- Trade-offs
- Excavation, lifting, disposal, saturated soil, adjacent foundations, utilities, and larger backfill volume
- Evidence to require
- Empty-tank inspection, removal and disposal receipt, excavation condition, approved fill and compaction
- Method
- Collapse in place and fill
- Potential fit
- Authority approves leaving material below grade and the tank can be safely accessed by equipment
- Trade-offs
- Must eliminate the hollow vessel, avoid worker entry, compact fill, and address every compartment
- Evidence to require
- Photographs of broken top, walls and bottom, approved fill, lift placement, final inspection, and measured location
- Method
- Approved flowable fill or concrete
- Potential fit
- Special access or structural conditions where the authority and design accept it
- Trade-offs
- Cost, added mass, future excavation, ensuring complete void fill, and preventing trapped water
- Evidence to require
- Written approval, mix and quantity, placement method, vent or access plan, and final record
- Method
- Leave empty with lid
- Potential fit
- Not a safe permanent abandonment method
- Trade-offs
- Cover and shell can deteriorate; water and gas can collect; future owners may not know
- Evidence to require
- Do not accept as final closure
- Method
- Fill with debris or trash
- Potential fit
- Never a defensible closure method
- Trade-offs
- Voids, settlement, contamination, sharp material, pests, and no compaction control
- Evidence to require
- Use only approved clean fill and documented disposal for removed material